The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities
Hansen, R., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Rall, E., Kabisch, N., Kaczorowska, A., … Pauleit, S. (2015). The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities. Ecosystem Services, 12, 228–246. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities
Journal
Ecosystem Services
ISSN/ISBN
2212-0416
DOI
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
Author(s)
Rieke HansenNiki FrantzeskakiTimon McPhearsonEmily RallNadja KabischAnna KaczorowskaJaan-Henrik KainMartina ArtmannStephan Pauleit
Published year
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)EcologyGeography, Planning and DevelopmentGlobal and Planetary ChangeManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawNature and Landscape Conservation
Ecosystem services (ES) are gaining increasing attention as a promising concept to more actively consider and plan for the varied benefits of the urban environment. Yet, to have an impact on decision-making, the concept must spread from academia to practice. To understand how ES have been taken up in planning discourses we conducted a cross-case comparison of planning documents in Berlin, New York, Salzburg, Seattle and Stockholm. We found: (1) explicit references to the ES concept were primarily in documents from Stockholm and New York, two cities in countries that entered into ES discourses early. (2) Implicit references and thus potential linkages between the ES concept and planning discourses were found frequently among all cities, especially in Seattle. (3) The thematic scope, represented by 21 different ES, is comparably broad among the cases, while cultural services and habitat provision are most frequently emphasized. (4) High-level policies were shown to promote the adoption of the ES concept in planning. We find that the ES concept holds potential to strengthen a holistic consideration of urban nature and its benefits in planning. We also revealed potential for further development of ES approaches with regard to mitigation of environmental impacts and improving urban resilience.
Kaczorowska, A., Haase, D., McPhearson, T. & Frantzeskaki, N. (2014). Ecosystem services in urban landscapes: practical applications and governance implications – the URBES approach. UGEC Viewpoints, 10, 21-26.
Lim, H. K., & Kain, J.-H. (2016). Compact Cities Are Complex, Intense and Diverse but: Can We Design Such Emergent Urban Properties? Urban Planning, 1(1), 95. doi:10.17645/up.v1i1.535
Hansen R., Frantzeskaki N., McPhearson T., Rall E.L. Kaczorowska A., Kain J.-H., Kabisch N., Artmann M., Wurster D., Pauleit S. (2013). Are we ready for urban ecosystem services yet? Institutional conditions for application of the urban ecosystem service framework in Berlin, New York, Rotterdam, Salzburg and Stockholm. Conference paper presented at the First Congress of the Society for Urban Ecology (SURE). Berlin, 25-27 July, 2013.
Platform: GothenburgType: Conference paper (peer-reviewed)Published year: