Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology
Lawhon, M., & Murphy, J. T. (2011). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 354–378. doi:10.1177/0309132511427960
Sustainability is increasingly becoming a core focus of geography, linking subfields such as urban, economic, and political ecology, yet strategies for achieving this goal remain illusive. Socio-technical transition theorists have made important contributions to our knowledge of the challenges and possibilities for achieving more sustainable societies, but this body of work generally lacks consideration of the influences of geography and power relations as forces shaping sustainability initiatives in practice. This paper assesses the significance for geographers interested in understanding the space, time, and scalar characteristics of sustainable development of one major strand of socio-technical transition theory, the multi-level perspective on socio-technical regime transitions. We describe the socio-technical transition approach, identify four major limitations facing it, show how insights from geographers – particularly political ecologists – can help address these challenges, and briefly examine a case study (GMO and food production) showing how a refined transition framework can improve our understanding of the social, political, and spatial dynamics that shape the prospects for more just and environmentally sustainable forms of development.
Lawhon, M. (2012). Contesting power, trust and legitimacy in the South African e-waste transition. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 69–86. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9146-x
Lawhon, M. (2012). Relational Power in the Governance of a South African E-Waste Transition. Environment and Planning A, 44(4), 954–971. doi:10.1068/a44354