Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving

Polk, M. (2014). Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 439–451. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7

Platform
Global
Publication type
Scientific article (peer-reviewed)
DOI Title
Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving
Journal
Sustainability Science
ISSN/ISBN
1862-4065 1862-4057
DOI
10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7
Author(s)
Merritt Polk
Published year
Subject
Ecology Geography, Planning and Development Global and Planetary Change Sociology and Political Science Health(social science) Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Nature and Landscape Conservation
Tags
Transdisciplinary reserach sustainability Symmetrical participation

 

Abstract

Transdisciplinarity is often presented as a way to effectively use scientific research to contribute to societal problem solving for sustainability. The aim of this paper is to critically explore this statement. This is done in two ways. First, a literature survey of transdisciplinary research is used to identify the assumptions that underlie the positive relationship between transdisciplinarity and societal problem solving for sustainability. This mapping identifies the claim that in-depth participation of users and the integration of relevant knowledge from both practice and research in real-world problem contexts produce socially robust results that contribute to sustainability. Second, the ability to live up to this claim is presented and discussed in five case study projects from Mistra Urban Futures, a transdisciplinary center in Göteborg, Sweden. The conclusions show that transdisciplinary processes, which fulfill the above conditions, do produce different types of socially robust knowledge, but this does not necessarily result in the ability to influence change in a sustainable direction. This instead creates a paradox in that the participation of stakeholders and the integration of knowledge from diverse sources require spaces that are both embedded in and insulated from practice and science proper. Such spaces produce results that are not easily aligned with sector-based target groups and formal policy processes. Institutionalizing transdisciplinarity in a boundary organization therefore solves some problems regarding participation and balanced problem ownership. However, it also creates new, hybrid problems, regarding knowledge transfer and scalability, which bridge the boundaries and challenge the praxis of planning and policy making.

Related publications