Reflection when Implementing

During the implementation it is also important to examine how the project relates to the qualities for joint knowledge production.

How collection of information (data) will be done, and who will do the work?
How interpretation and analysis will be done, and who will do the work?
How the work of report-writing will be done, and who will do it?
What are the consequences of having different perspectives and sources of knowledge?
How is this dealt with in science and practice?
What is the division of work for data collection, analysis and writing?
Which elements do we intend to collaborate on, and why?
Which elements do we intend to work on individually, and why?
What will we gain and what will we lose by doing what we have planned?
How can we include different perspectives and ways of interpreting and understanding the data collected?
Are there connections between different ways of interpreting and understanding data?
Are there perspectives that have to be "abandoned" because they, for some reason, do not fit into the picture which is
emerging?
What have we learned from cooperating on the analysis?
What are the results/answers to questions?
Which results concern the participants' regular operations, and in what way?
What else needs to be done so that more of those who are involved in these operations take an interest in the results
and their application?
Which knowledge and insights generated by the project are the most important, and how can they be transferred to
other contexts?
How can the application of relevant project results be spread locally, nationally and perhaps to the centre's other
platforms?

Share icons